Popularity of Darcy Ammerman’s Articles
Darcy Ammerman’s writings from McMillan LLP have gained significant traction among senior executives in companies, as well as professionals in human resources, finance, and taxation throughout Canada. The articles are especially well-received among those working in sectors such as accounting, consultancy, banking, credit, and insurance.
OSFI Releases Updated Guidance for Crypto Asset Exposure
In late October 2025, Canada’s primary regulatory body for banking and insurance, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), unveiled new guidelines on the treatment of crypto asset exposures by federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs). These revisions introduce specific adjustments aimed at relaxing certain limitations on crypto asset exposures while maintaining a cautious, risk-based approach to regulation. OSFI’s communication to the sector on October 29, 2025, modifies two comprehensive guidelines related to the capital treatment of crypto assets that were initially published in February 2025.
Increased Allowance for Crypto Asset Exposure
One of the key changes is an increase in the exposure limit for banks and insurance companies. Institutions can now allocate up to 5% of their Tier 1 capital to specific crypto assets, classified as Group 2 assets, which include cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether. This marks a significant rise from the previous limit of 1%. By allowing a higher percentage of capital to be invested in crypto assets, OSFI acknowledges the expansion of the crypto market and its growing integration into conventional finance, thus providing regulated entities with more opportunities to engage.
Elimination of Punitive Treatment for Higher Crypto Exposure
Previously, if an FRFI’s investment in riskier crypto assets surpassed 1% of its Tier 1 capital, those assets were classified as Group 2b, attracting the most severe capital treatment with a risk weight of 1250%. This reclassification resulted in strict capital requirements and disallowed recognition of hedging strategies. The updated guidelines abolish this automatic reclassification, allowing FRFIs to exceed the old 1% cap up to the new 5% limit without incurring the harsh capital penalties. Consequently, institutions can maintain a greater amount of crypto assets and have them classified under the more favorable Group 2a capital rules.
Implementation Timeline for Updated Guidelines
The newly revised guidelines will be effective for reporting periods following November 1, 2025, for institutions with October 31 year-ends, and January 1, 2026, for those with December 31 year-ends. This adjustment reflects a notable yet cautious shift in OSFI’s approach to crypto regulation, which the organization describes as “more risk-sensitive” compared to the conservative measures adopted in August 2022. For example, a large bank with a Tier 1 capital of $50 billion could see its allowable crypto exposure increase from $500 million to $2.5 billion, potentially enabling greater participation in the crypto sector.
Expectations from FRFIs Regarding Crypto Holdings
Despite the relaxed regulations, OSFI emphasizes that FRFIs must remain vigilant and not exceed the 5% cap. Should an institution breach this limit, it is required to report the situation immediately and take corrective action. Additionally, if the cap is exceeded, all Group 2 crypto exposures would be reclassified as Group 2b assets, subjecting them to the full deduction treatment. OSFI has also stated its intention to continue examining various factors, including the appropriate risk weight for Group 2a assets, the potential for certain crypto assets to be recognized as collateral, and the handling of cross-market hedging strategies. These considerations may lead to further changes that could eventually allow banks to utilize crypto assets as collateral for loans.
OSFI’s Guidance Reflects a Balanced Approach
Overall, OSFI’s latest guidance indicates a measured easing of its stance on cryptocurrencies. It aligns with international standards, such as the Basel framework for crypto assets, while taking into account feedback from the industry to reduce restrictions. FRFIs involved in crypto can now look forward to clearer regulations and a slightly greater capacity for engagement. However, banks and insurance firms must still actively monitor their capital positions, conduct thorough risk assessments, and be prepared to explain their crypto-related activities to OSFI. This summary provides a general overview and should not be considered legal advice; specific counsel should be sought for particular situations.
